428PI vs 390

Engine, ignition, fuel, cooling, exhaust

Moderators: Ranchero50, DuckRyder

Post Reply
KF100TK
New Member
New Member
Posts: 183
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: CANADA, CALGARY

428PI vs 390

Post by KF100TK »

What are your opinions on the difference between a 428PI and a 390 4bbl with a modified cam? :?
I am debating a swap in my 70 F-100 shortbox 2wd. :hmm:
User avatar
Dragon
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2659
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Contact:

Re: 428PI vs 390

Post by Dragon »

Depends upon what you want to do. Of the pair the 428 will pull more power unless you went to a 390 stage 3 cam group in the Crower line. I used a Crower 535 lift cam in a 390 and then when I disintegrated the 390 I got the same cam for the replacement 428 and the 428 got completely crooked on me when I hit 2nd at 6000 rpm. The 390 at 6000 on the same street would just keep smoking the tires or do a wheely.

The engines used the same cam, the same 427 dual point dizzy, same intake, same headers, same 10.5 to 1 compression and same 950 3V Vacuum Secondary Holley. Every thing was the same except for a displacement change and a set 1958 352 PI machined combustion chamber heads on the 428.

Same everything else the power difference was massive.
Old Fords Rule
Was a Ford Service Tech
71 F250 with Shell Car 390 NP435 Dana 60 3.73s, PS, PB, 750 EC VS Holley Accel Points Eliminator.
98 Volvo S70 2.4T Auto
71 Service manuals Volumes 1,2,3 and 4 So ask away. :)
My Gallery
Spark test
427
New Member
New Member
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:38 pm
Location: Tennessee, Greeneville

Re: 428PI vs 390

Post by 427 »

The 390 would tolerate more rpm. But the 428 would have more tourqe and make a heavy vehicle move quick.
68 f100 427 r code 4spd toploader
69 f350 390 4spd hauler bed
72 Ford Bronco 302 3spd
95 Ford Lightning
38 John Deere G
Assorted old Honda ATC,s
User avatar
Dragon
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2659
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Contact:

Re: 428PI vs 390

Post by Dragon »

Totally agree. I spun two 428s to 7000 weekend after weekend and they ate bottom end parts real fast. One I could put my hand through the side of the block and grab the bent rods.

5 390s survived 8000 over twice as long, well 390 stroke but bored any where from stock to 60 over and they lasted with never a blowup as the 428s. The 1000 rpm difference in redlines made up for the smaller engines as the ET was always in the same ballpark of 9.21 avg. with 9.01 and 9.42 as the ends.

To this day I dislike stokers except for pure race motors because of the stress that long strokes cause.

Changing the rear gears to take advantage of the 390 rpm difference dropped me to 9.10 avg.

Don't even try those rpm ranges with stock bottom ends. I used Forged 427 cranks and Aluminum rods most times. Forged pistons finished the bottom with top of the line Clevite 77 bearings.
Old Fords Rule
Was a Ford Service Tech
71 F250 with Shell Car 390 NP435 Dana 60 3.73s, PS, PB, 750 EC VS Holley Accel Points Eliminator.
98 Volvo S70 2.4T Auto
71 Service manuals Volumes 1,2,3 and 4 So ask away. :)
My Gallery
Spark test
User avatar
FORD428CJ
New Member
New Member
Posts: 158
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 11:13 am
Location: Oregon, Klamath Falls

Re: 428PI vs 390

Post by FORD428CJ »

I really don't see the need to spin up a 428 to 7,000+ RPM myself. I have spun mine up to 6,000rpms a lot with no problems at all (with stock rods). And it was a daily driver too. I know quite a few people off the Fordfe.com Forum have used 428 cranks and has lived many of years out on the drag strip and still going to this day. Just make sure you have a nice flat bed for it (Mains are true) and clearances are right. Your Rod ratio isnt bad with a 428 crank. Still above the 1.5 rod to stroke ratio. JMHO
Wes Adams FORD428CJ
Built Ford Tuff With Good Ford Stuff
79 F-250 X-Cab 4x4 6.9 Turbo Diesel
64 Falcon X-Ram 428
55 FORD Truck 4-link Rides on air with X-Ram 428
67 Stang 351 C/J
2000 Yamaha V-MAX VMOA#4277
User avatar
averagef250
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 4387
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:58 am
Location: Oregon, Beavercreek

Re: 428PI vs 390

Post by averagef250 »

With a 428 stroke, at 7000 RPM your piston speed is approaching light speed times two. The rules of physics sort of dictate you don't spin an engine with that much stroke much over 6000.
1970 F-250 4x4 original Willock swivel frame chassis '93 5.9 Cummins/Getrag/NP205/HP60/D70
User avatar
Dragon
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2659
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Contact:

Re: 428PI vs 390

Post by Dragon »

Racing only Racing never street. We spun a Hemi to 9000 in AA/FD you want to talk about piston speed. The only thing that kept the pistons on the rods was the blower.
The rules of physics sort of dictate you don't spin an engine with that much stroke much over 6000.
The rules of Physics don't matter to me when I am out to win. So the engine fails sooner it was pure race A/Gas

4643.333 for a 428 at 7000
5040 for the 390s at 8000
2750 for my new engine(376) when it gets built.
3276 for my current 390 after I put the new cam in.
Old Fords Rule
Was a Ford Service Tech
71 F250 with Shell Car 390 NP435 Dana 60 3.73s, PS, PB, 750 EC VS Holley Accel Points Eliminator.
98 Volvo S70 2.4T Auto
71 Service manuals Volumes 1,2,3 and 4 So ask away. :)
My Gallery
Spark test
User avatar
FORD428CJ
New Member
New Member
Posts: 158
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 11:13 am
Location: Oregon, Klamath Falls

Re: 428PI vs 390

Post by FORD428CJ »

if you would like to spin an engine to 8600RPM all day with no problem for years on end..........SNOWMOBILING is where its at!!! JMHO
Wes Adams FORD428CJ
Built Ford Tuff With Good Ford Stuff
79 F-250 X-Cab 4x4 6.9 Turbo Diesel
64 Falcon X-Ram 428
55 FORD Truck 4-link Rides on air with X-Ram 428
67 Stang 351 C/J
2000 Yamaha V-MAX VMOA#4277
User avatar
Dragon
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2659
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Contact:

Re: 428PI vs 390

Post by Dragon »

I used to work in a motorcycle shop that took in snow mobiles in the summer and rebuilt them. They do LAST.
Old Fords Rule
Was a Ford Service Tech
71 F250 with Shell Car 390 NP435 Dana 60 3.73s, PS, PB, 750 EC VS Holley Accel Points Eliminator.
98 Volvo S70 2.4T Auto
71 Service manuals Volumes 1,2,3 and 4 So ask away. :)
My Gallery
Spark test
KF100TK
New Member
New Member
Posts: 183
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: CANADA, CALGARY

Re: 428PI vs 390

Post by KF100TK »

Thanks for the replies guys. An FE with a c-6 auto. could'nt get those kind of rpm's anyhow would they? :hmm:
User avatar
390F100
New Member
New Member
Posts: 174
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 2:14 am
Location: Florence,Az
Contact:

Re: 428PI vs 390

Post by 390F100 »

If you really like spinning engines to 9000 rpm go buy a honda with a b16 or a b18c1 in it. Those motors are dang near bullet proof, their bottom ends are as solid as they come and 9k all day is extremely fun... :evil: but then again, so is the old american muscle :thup:
"There's no replacement for displacement"
1968 Ford F-100 2wd 390FE
1993 Toyota P/U 22RE
2001 Toyota Camry 2.2
2004 Toyota Solara 2.4
2007 Yamaha Vstar 650 Custom
2007 Suzuki S40 650
User avatar
Dragon
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2659
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Contact:

Re: 428PI vs 390

Post by Dragon »

KF100TK wrote:Thanks for the replies guys. An FE with a c-6 auto. could'nt get those kind of rpm's anyhow would they? :hmm:
The c6 shifting at 7000 would break most times with the horsepower that is designed into a 7000 rpm 428. But they can spin that fast. They are very well balanced.
Old Fords Rule
Was a Ford Service Tech
71 F250 with Shell Car 390 NP435 Dana 60 3.73s, PS, PB, 750 EC VS Holley Accel Points Eliminator.
98 Volvo S70 2.4T Auto
71 Service manuals Volumes 1,2,3 and 4 So ask away. :)
My Gallery
Spark test
User avatar
My427stang
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 502
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:52 am
Location: Omaha, NE

Re: 428PI vs 390

Post by My427stang »

KF100TK wrote:What are your opinions on the difference between a 428PI and a 390 4bbl with a modified cam? :?
I am debating a swap in my 70 F-100 shortbox 2wd. :hmm:
What do you want the truck to do?

A 390 with a cam, headers, intake and a little port work will run strong.

The same setup in a 428 will make more torque and peaks will be at a little lower RPM. However, it wont be dramaticly faster , and if you have to go out and buy a 428 but have a 390, it may not be worth the extra dough.
71 F-100 SB 4x4, 461 FE, Edelbrock Pro-flo 4, 4 speed, 4 inch softride lift, all poly bushings, integral PS, most mods installed since the 80's
70 Mustang Sportsroof 489 FE, EFI, TKO-600 5 speed, 4.11s
Engine building by-appointment only--30+ years, specializing in strong street pump gas FEs
User avatar
Dragon
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2659
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Contact:

Re: 428PI vs 390

Post by Dragon »

That is why most of my race engines are 390s.
Old Fords Rule
Was a Ford Service Tech
71 F250 with Shell Car 390 NP435 Dana 60 3.73s, PS, PB, 750 EC VS Holley Accel Points Eliminator.
98 Volvo S70 2.4T Auto
71 Service manuals Volumes 1,2,3 and 4 So ask away. :)
My Gallery
Spark test
KF100TK
New Member
New Member
Posts: 183
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: CANADA, CALGARY

Re: 428PI vs 390

Post by KF100TK »

My427stang wrote:
KF100TK wrote:What are your opinions on the difference between a 428PI and a 390 4bbl with a modified cam? :?
I am debating a swap in my 70 F-100 shortbox 2wd. :hmm:
What do you want the truck to do?

A 390 with a cam, headers, intake and a little port work will run strong.

The same setup in a 428 will make more torque and peaks will be at a little lower RPM. However, it wont be dramaticly faster , and if you have to go out and buy a 428 but have a 390, it may not be worth the extra dough.
:thup: That was the answer i was looking for! My truck is just a summer weekend fun truck :D .
I need to freshen up the motor(390), but a neighbor has a freshly rebuilt 428 for sale so i was debating if
there was enough difference to warrant the extra money. :fr:
Post Reply